How to install CCTV cameras in corridors? How to install CCTV cameras in corridors? When designing an indoor video surveillance system, a common iss
How to install CCTV cameras in corridors?
When designing an indoor video surveillance system, a common issue involves the control of corridors. The main task involves monitoring the movement of guests and personnel. This monitoring activity provides valuable data regarding the time and pattern of movement of the people being observed which can be used if post-incident analysis is needed.
Consider the length and width of the corridor, ceiling height, and presence of possible obstacles (doors, items of furniture, etc.).
What is the minimal number of cameras sufficient for monitoring a corridor 15 meters long? 30 meters? Please justify the need for this number of cameras.
What are the specs of each camera that are crucial to fulfilling the task at hand? Please explain your choice.
What’s the proper positioning of the cameras – opposite one another or one after the other?
Let’s start by clarifying a few points that are essential to solving the problem.
Load More :
CCTV systems are used to fulfill different tasks. Some of these are defined in national and international standards, such as in the EN 62676-2015, which deals with the tasks of identification, recognition and detection.
For corridor monitoring, a normal detection setting is 125 pixels per meter, since identification is handled at the entrance to the building and simple detection is not enough for post-incident analysis using the video surveillance archive.
No matter how small the corridor is, it is impossible to eliminate single camera “dead zones” (i.e., zones that are not in the camera’s field of view).
This person in the foreground will eventually step into a “dead zone” and disappear from the camera’s view. Therefore, we cannot guess from this camera whether he will proceed forward through the door to the staircase or turn right to the door of the office.
We’re generally not interested in the entire image delivered by the surveillance camera. Rather, just the most important aspects, including the observation targets, their recognition, time of appearance on camera, and their further actions. The rest is simply background noise that loads the network equipment with extra traffic and wastes hard drive and archive storage system space. Compare the informational capacity of two images:
These images come from the same camera. The difference is only in the frame format: 16:9 or a frame rotated by 90°, resulting in an aspect ratio of 9:16. This function is supported by a limited number of cameras and video management systems (software controlling and recording video from surveillance cameras), but it is essential for monitoring corridors. It’s commonly known as corridor format or corridor mode.
Keeping in mind that all cameras have a dead zone and that we’re not interested in walls when monitoring a corridor and trying to recognize individuals along the entire length of a corridor (that is, recognizing individuals who we know personally or whose close-up has been registered at the entrance to the building), we can begin to set up our surveillance cameras.
For a small corridor, the method of installing cameras at opposite ends facing one another generally works well. This allows you to monitor the entire length of the corridor using only two cameras. Depending on the length of the corridor, you should select the optimal focal length that allows recognition of a familiar person, described in EN 62676-2015 or similar standard, throughout the entire corridor segment.
The camera resolution should be set so that it’s at least minimally sufficient to perform the job at hand. 1.3 or 2 megapixels are generally satisfactory, but a resolution of 4 or 5 MP (or more) may be necessary for longer corridors. That said, it’s necessary to keep in mind lower light sensitivity (the ability to “see” in dim lighting conditions) and ensure sufficient lighting.
Pay attention, as well, to the fact that obstacles (in our case, 2 ATMs) can obscure the field of view. Apart from the above, the corridor may contain additional areas of interest that need to be controlled by individual cameras:
In this particular example, it’s not optimal to control the zone in front of the ATM by the “corridor” cameras. A more effective solution would be to install a separate camera with a wide-angle lens in the immediate vicinity of the ATM.
For longer corridors, the camera placement method might be similar, but you should keep longer-focus lenses in mind, selecting them as necessary.
In some cases, it’s better to use the “piggyback” method, in which one camera looks at the “dead zone” of the next one – a typical setup for protecting extended perimeters. This kind of setup allows the video surveillance operator to better survey the area. Noting the mounting direction of each of the cameras on the floor makes them much less complicated to monitor.
However, this method, in its original form, is not optimal for long corridors due to the presence of “dead ends” and the fact that there is nobody to watch over the “dead zone” of the first camera:
The solution to this issue requires at least 2 cameras installed at the opposite ends, one against the other.
In order to minimize the background, namely the walls that don’t need to be monitored, it’s best to use cameras that have a “corridor” frame format setting (9:16).
As a rule, the longer the corridor, the longer the focal length of the camera’s lens should be. The second factor to consider is the camera’s image resolution. It must be sufficient, but don’t be too focused on higher megapixels, which often cause reduced light sensitivity of the sensor as well as an increase of the load on the network infrastructure and storage systems. These are good reasons not to put too much trust in advertising slogans, but instead carefully consider your real needs.